Writ petition withdrawn on the petitioner's instructions; the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn and the pending application rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
Through: Mr. Aditya Raj and Mr. Neel Kr. Sharma, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra and Mr. Parikshit Singh Bhati, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
% 19.11.2025
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2025/MK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:50:18
Abdul Wahid @ Raju
Union of India and Ors.
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
