Satvinder Singh Vs New Delhi Municipal Council and Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Satvinder Singh Vs New Delhi Municipal Council and Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petition disposed of with directions to both parties not to take unnecessary adjournments before the Estate Officer, NDMC; the Estate Officer requested to dispose of the proceedings as soon as feasible; merits not examined and all rights/contentions left open before the Authority.

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition can be entertained by this Court while proceedings remain pending adjudication before the Estate Officer, NDMC, Respondent No. 1 relying on Section 15 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. +1 more

Court's answer

The present Petition was accordingly disposed of in the foregoing terms, without deciding the maintainability question on its merits.

Ratio / Principle

Both parties were directed not to take any unnecessary adjournments in the proceedings before the Authority (Estate Officer, NDMC).

Key takeaways

The Estate Officer, NDMC was requested to dispose of the pending proceedings as soon as feasible.ratio¶21
It was clarified that the Court had not examined the matter on merits, and all rights and contentions of the parties were left open to be agitated before the Authority.ratio¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ petition (W.P.(C) 1930/2023) by Satvinder Singh against New Delhi Municipal Council and Ors., heard orally before Tara Vitasta Ganju, J. (High Court of Delhi, decision dated 22.01.2025). Respondent No. 1 challenged the maintainability of the petition on the ground that proceedings were pending adjudication before the Estate Officer, NDMC, invoking Section 15 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; the petitioner did not refute this and instead sought expeditious disposal of the pending proceedings. The Court disposed of the petition, directing both parties not to take unnecessary adjournments before the Authority and requesting the Estate Officer, NDMC to dispose of the proceedings as soon as feasible. The Court expressly clarified that it had not examined the matter on merits and that all rights and contentions of the parties remained open to be agitated before the Authority. Parties to act on the digitally signed copy of the order.

$~62

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: 22.01.2025

W.P.(C) 1930/2023

SATVINDER SINGH .....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Manya Hasija, Adv.

versus

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, ASC with Mr. Priyankar Tiwari, Mr. Hardik Saxena, Advs. for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)

At the outset, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 challenges the maintainability of the present Petition. He submits that this Court cannot entertain the present Petition in view of the fact that proceedings are pending adjudication before the Estate Officer, NDMC [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’]. He seeks to rely upon Section 15 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [hereinafter referred to as ‘PP Act’] in this regard.

1.1 This contention is not refuted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. However, a request is made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner for expeditious disposal of the proceedings pending before the Authority.

Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1, on instructions, submits that

Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 2

W.P.(C) 1930/2023

Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Da te:2 7.01.2025 16:21:00

the Respondent No.1 shall not take unnecessary adjournments before the Authority during the proceedings and will take steps to ensure a speedy disposal.

Both parties are directed not to take any unnecessary adjournments in the proceedings before the Authority.

The Estate Officer, NDMC is requested to dispose of the proceedings as soon as is feasible.

The present Petition is accordingly disposed of in the aforegoing terms.

It is clarified that this Court has not examined the matter on merits. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open in this regard to be agitated before the Authority.

The parties shall act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

JANUARY 22, 2025/jn

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

W.P.(C) 1930/2023

Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Da te:2 7.01.2025 16:21:00