Iifl Home Finance Ltd. v. Raj Kumari Shukla
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to challenge DRT orders; the court was not inclined to interfere. The respondent had been dispossessed despite a stay granted by the DRT and was rendered homeless. Petition was permitted to be withdrawn with a direction to restore possession of the property forthwith.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw writ petition granted; petitioner directed to restore possession of the property to the respondent forthwith.