Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Liberty granted to withdraw the petition and pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
SURAVAJJULA RAVI KUMAR AND OTHERS
.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Venkita Subramoniam, Mr. Rahat Bansal, Mr. Hari Vishnu and Mr. Harsh Anand, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Mr. Adhiraj Singh, GP and Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
O R D E R
% 10.12.2025
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J
DECEMBER 10, 2025 /ys/k/DG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2025 at 13:07:17
Suravajjula Ravi Kumar and Others
Union of India and Ors
Navin Chawla
Madhu Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
