Writ petition against the Central Reserve Police Force was withdrawn with liberty to institute an appropriate petition at an appropriate stage; the court disposed of it as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw the writ petition and to institute an appropriate petition at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~110
SACHIN BABU MUNDHE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vertika Sharma and Mr. Kunal Goswami, Advs.
versus
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon G.P
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL) % 10.12.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition as he submits that he intends to institute an appropriate petition at an appropriate stage.
2. Leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
DECEMBER 10, 2025/ dsn
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Da te:1 5.12.2025 15:39:19
Sachin Babu Mundhe
Central Reserve Police Force
C. HARI SHANKAR
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
