Writ petition seeking a direction to respondents to dispose of and respond to the petitioner's legal notice dated 14.03.2024. The court directed that the legal notice be treated as a representation and answered within eight weeks, expressly without expressing any opinion on its merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
JINCY PHILIP .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ira Singh, Mr. Rishav Dubey, Mr. Saurabh Bhusan and Mr. Jitendra Gautam, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:29:50
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
JANUARY 9, 2025 SU/F/IK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:29:50
Jincy Philip
Union of India and Ors
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
