Counsel recognition application in a writ petition recording that advocate Ribhav Pande appeared for the petitioner on 11 September 2025; respondents did not dispute, and the application was disposed of. No substantive adjudication.
Appearance of counsel recorded on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ASHVINI KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Vyas and Mr. Ribhav Pande, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, SPC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA O R D E R % 25.09.2025
CM APPL. 61294/2025
1. This application seeks recognition of the fact that Mr. Ribhav Pande had appeared as one of the Counsel on behalf of the petitioner on 11 September 2025.
2. Learned Counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact.
3. Accordingly, Mr. Ribhav Pande’s appearance shall be treated as having been recorded on behalf of the petitioner on 11 September 2025.
4. The application stands disposed of.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2025/ dsn
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/09/2025 at 12:01:17
Ashvini Kumar Sharma
Union of India and Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
