Masih Ayaz Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Dec 2025W.P.(C)/18214/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Unauthorized construction demolition undertaking MCD Katra Mallah Kalan Mahal New Delhi respondent no. 6 part demolition requisite action writ petition disposed rights reserved W.P.(C) 18214/2025 Mini Pushkarna December 2025

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and pending applications disposed of; MCD held bound by its statement to take requisite action if respondent no. 6 fails to demolish the remaining unauthorized construction; right of any aggrieved party to seek remedies against MCD action or non-action reserved. ¶¶17

Masih Ayaz Khan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~31

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 18214/2025, CM APPL. 75310/2025 & CM APPL. 75311/2025 MASIH AYAZ KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Advocate along with petitioner in person. Mob: 9899186420 Email: [email protected] versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, SC for MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Ms. Khushi and Ms. Anita R Mishra, Advocates for MCD Mob: 9212036118 Email: [email protected] Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar, Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Mr. Durgesh Bharti, Mr. Rudra Palliwal, Advocates for R-5 SHO, Jama Masjid Mr. Tushar Sannu and Ms. Ishika Jain, Advocates for DWB Mob: 9911991166 Email: [email protected]

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶5

O R D E R

¶6

% 01.12.2025

¶7

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent nos. 1 and 2, to remove the unauthorized construction, being

¶8

This is a digitally signed order.

¶9

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/12/2025 at 12:14:18

¶10

carried out in the property No. 1464, Second Floor, Katra Mallah, Kalan Mahal, New Delhi-110002 .

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though unauthorized construction was being carried out earlier in the property in question, however, after the complaint by the petitioner, the said construction has been stopped by respondent no. 6.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) submits that the unauthorized construction has already been stopped.

¶13

He further submits that respondent no. 6 has already carried out part demolition of the unauthorized construction, and that the respondent no. 6 has also undertaken to demolish rest of the unauthorized construction existing in the property in question.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-MCD further submits that in case respondent no. 6 does not demolish rest of the unauthorized construction, requisite action shall be taken by the MCD.

¶15

The aforesaid statement is taken note of and the MCD is held bound by the same.

¶16

In case, any party is aggrieved by any action or non-action on the part of the MCD, their right to seek remedies is reserved.

¶17

Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with the pending applications, is disposed of.

¶18

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶19

DECEMBER 1, 2025 ak

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/12/2025 at 12:14:18

Masih Ayaz Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Masih Ayaz Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. Vs Sh. Pawan Kamra

Prince Ptc College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs Amarjeet Singh

Vijay Kumar Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sher Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shree Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati Ptc College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

State Bank of India Vs M/S G I Enterprises through Its Proprietor Ms Pooja Anand & Ors.

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan through Its Commissioner Vs Sh. Tarkeshwar Tiwari

Sankalp Recreation Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd.

Serentica Renewables India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Gurmeet Singh Juneja Vs MCD and Ors.

Lancers Convent Sr Sec School Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Smt. Asha Shukla Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Goyal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi (Mcd) & Anr.