Writ petition sought a direction to declare the petitioner's result in 'Design of Experiments'. Respondents stated the result had been declared and the prayer stood satisfied; the petitioner did not dispute this. The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
versus
NETAJI SUBHAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ORS
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Ms. Praneeta Sharma, Ms. Sonika Rathore, Mr. Arinjay Bisht, Mr. Mani Kant and Ms. Shikha Singh, Advs. for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 22.04.2025
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
APRIL 22, 2025/ N.S. ASWAL
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:50:38
1 issue framed by the court
Should the respondents be directed to declare the petitioner's result for the subject 'Design of Experiments (Paper Code MEMNC01)'?
SANTOSH SAHANI
NETAJI SUBHAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ORS
VIKAS MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
