Disposed¶17

Madan Lal Kalkal v. the Chairman Judge Incharge Allotment Committee and Anr.

Delhi HC22 Jan 2025W.P.(C)/17386/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chamber allotment Karkardooma Court Complex; Chamber Allotment Committee; inter-se seniority list of 113 members September 2009; representation dated 12.01.2024 Annexure P-5; order dated 20.12.2022 in W.P.(C) 11092/2022; Building Maintenance and Construction Committee; direction to decide representation within three months; Madan Lal Kalkal; Delhi High Court; Sachin Datta J; writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Chamber Allotment Committee of Karkardooma Court Complex to act in consonance with the order/judgment dated 20.12.2022 in W.P.(C) 11092/2022 and to take a decision on the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2024, within three months; all pending applications (CM APPLs.74032/2024, 74033/2024) stand disposed of. ¶17

Madan Lal Kalkal Vs the Chairman Judge Incharge Allotment Committee and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, who alleges he has not been considered for allotment of a chamber in Karkardooma Court, Delhi despite representations (including one dated 12.01.2024) and despite the directions in the order dated 20.12.2022 in W.P.(C) 11092/2022, is entitled to a direction compelling decision/allotment.

¶7

Court's answer

With consent of counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of with direction to the Chamber Allotment Committee of Karkardooma Court Complex to act in consonance with the order/judgment dated 20.12.2022 in W.P.(C) 11092/2022 and also to take a decision on the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2024.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

The above exercise (acting in consonance with the 20.12.2022 order and deciding the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2024) is to be completed within three months.

¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Sachin Datta, J.; order dated 22.01.2025 in W.P.(C) 17386/2024) — Madan Lal Kalkal v. The Chairman Judge Incharge Allotment Committee & Anr.: Petition alleging non-consideration for allotment of a chamber in Karkardooma Court, Delhi. The Court noted the earlier order dated 20.12.2022 in W.P.(C) 11092/2022, whereby the Chamber Allotment Committee of Karkardooma Court Complex was directed not to disturb the inter-se seniority of the members originally in the list of 113 persons drawn in September 2009, with provision for representations to the Building Maintenance and Construction Committee (Karkardooma Court Complex), and noted the petitioner's unanswered representation dated 12.01.2024 (Annexure P-5). With consent of counsel, the petition was disposed of with direction to the Chamber Allotment Committee to act in consonance with the order dated 20.12.2022 and to take a decision on the representation dated 12.01.2024 within three months. Pending applications disposed of.

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 17386/2024 and CM APPLs.74032/2024, 74033/2024 MADAN LAL KALKAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Tanwar, Mr. Mohd. Bilal, Advs. along with the Petitioner in Person

¶4

versus

¶5

THE CHAIRMAN JUDGE INCHARGE ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Udit Malik (ASC) along with Ms. Rima Rao, Ms. Palak Sharma, Advs.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 22.01.2025

¶7

The present petition filed by the petitioner raises a grievance that the petitioner has not been considered for allotment of chamber in the Karkardooma Court, Delhi.

¶8

Numerous representations in this regard are stated to have been made by the petitioner. One of the representations dated 12.01.2024 has been filed as Annexure P-5 of the present petition.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner also draws attention to order/judgment dated 20.12.2022 passed in W.P.(C) 11092/2022 in which this Court inter alia directed as under:-

¶10

“12. In these facts and circumstances, the present writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the Chamber Allotment Committee of Karkardooma Court Complex to not disturb the inter-se seniority of the members who were originally part of the list of 113 persons drawn in September, 2009. If any persons are to be added to the said seniority list, based upon the eligibility, the said seniority list shall be drawn up

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2025 at 14:27:51

¶13

without disturbing the original list of 113 members, in terms of the direction given in paragraph 10 above.

¶14

13. It is made clear that upon the drawing of the list by the Chamber Allotment Committee, if the Petitioners or any other members have any grievance, they are permitted to make a representation before the Building Maintenance and Construction Committee (Karkardooma Court Complex), of the Delhi High Court, which would consider the said representation. The decision taken by the Building Maintenance and Construction Committee (Karkardooma Court Complex), Delhi High Court, shall be adhered to by all the parties concerned.”

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the directions contained in the said order, the Chamber Allotment Committee of Karkardooma Court Complex has not taken any decision with regard to allotment of chambers; the petitioner’s representation has also not even been responded to.

¶16

After some hearing, with the consent of respective counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the Chamber Allotment Committee of Karkardooma Court Complex to act in consonance with the aforesaid order/judgment dated 20.12.2022 passed in W.P.(C) 11092/2022 and also take a decision on the petitioner’s representation dated 12.01.2024.

¶17

Let the same be done within a period of three months from today.

¶18

All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶19

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶20

JANUARY 22, 2025/ uk

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2025 at 14:27:51

Madan Lal Kalkal v. the Chairman Judge Incharge Allotment Committee and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madan Lal Kalkal v. the Chairman Judge Incharge Allotment Committee and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Sh. Sunil Solanki

Shri Sanjar Fazal Alam and Ors. Vs Union of India

Gitarattan International Business School Under the Aegis of Rohini Educational Society Vs Directorate of Higher Education Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Om Prakash Lakhina Vs UOI & Ors.

UOI and Ors. Vs Ashu and Ors.

Rajender Jain and Ors. Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Vishvanath Agarwal Vs Election Commission of India and Ors.

UOI and Ors. Vs Chinmay Garg and Ors.

Rakesh Agarwal Vs Union of India

Delhi Distillers and Brewers Association Vs Dsiidc and Ors.

Ms. Urmi Rana & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Well Protect Manpower Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deep Chand Bandhu Hospital & Anr.

Perfect Aviation Services Limited Vs 1. Union of India & Ors.

Wangdak Lueschak Vs Union of India & Ors.