Two-line order: writ petition against the Bar Council of India and others was withdrawn by counsel after arguments; petition dismissed as withdrawn with pending applications closed. Decides nothing of general application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request; pending CM applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Preet Pal Singh with Ms T. Kaur and Mr Yash Saini, Advocates for BCI Mr T. Singhdev with Mr Tanishq Srivastava, Mr Abhijit Chakravarty and Ms Yamini Singh, Advocates for R3.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 09.01.2025 1. After some arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.
VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 09, 2025/ tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 13:05:18
Mehar Oberoi
Bar Council of India
Respondent No. 3
Vibhu Bakhru
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
