Petitioners withdrew the writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies. The Delhi High Court disposed of the application without entering into the merits.
Withdrawal allowed with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
SHRI ATUL KUMAR GARG & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg and Mr. Imran Khan, Advocates.
versus
THE SPECIAL TASK FORCE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umakant Mishra, ASC with Mr.Dipansh Mishra, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2/MCD. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Nikhil Kadha and Mr.Shivam, Advocates for Respondent No.3/DDA. Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Advocate for Respondents No.5 and 6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 10.02.2025
CM APPL. 7830/2025
W.P.(C) 1612/2025
W.P.(C) 1612/2025 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:02:25
JYOTI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2025
B.S. Rohella
W.P.(C) 1612/2025 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:02:25
Shri Atul Kumar Garg
The Special Task Force
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
