Petitioner holding a Certificate of Vending sought clarity on his right to conduct vending activity. The Court found no reason to doubt that he may vend in accordance with the certificate and disposed of the petition, observing no orders were called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
Through: Ms. Shivani Verma, Ms. Mansi and Mr. Siddharth Sarup, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through: Ms. Puja S. Kalra, Adv. for MCD. Mr. Badar Mahmood, SPC for UOI with Mr. Ammar Ahmad, Adv. with SI Shilpy Gupta, P.S. South Campus.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 24.09.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2025 at 11:55:55
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 24, 2025/ sky/as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2025 at 11:55:55
Vinod Kashyap
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
