Mohd. Asif v. Mr. Parveen Kumar & Ors.

Delhi HC18 Sept 2025W.P.(C)/14508/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 14508/2025; Mohd. Asif v. Parveen Kumar & Ors.; Mini Pushkarna J; order dated 18.09.2025; protection against dispossession without due process of law; plot B-371, Khasra No. 57/12/1 Southern Portion, Village Karawal Nagar, Illaqa Shahdara, Delhi-110094; pending civil suit CS(OS) 559/2025 for possession; MCD demolition action; remedy before Appellate Tribunal MCD (ATMCD); restraint on further unauthorized construction; right/title/interest left open; writ petition disposed of without notice.

What did the court decide?

Direction that the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the property except by due process of law, and restraint on the petitioner carrying out any further unauthorized construction; writ petition and pending applications disposed of without notice. ¶¶25

Mohd. Asif Vs Mr. Parveen Kumar & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~72

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 14508/2025 & CM APPL. 59464/2025, CM APPL. 59465/2025

¶4

MOHD. ASIF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bahar U. Barqui, Advocate Mob: 9811042858

¶5

versus

¶6

MR. PARVEEN KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shilpa Ohri, Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harshpreet Singh, Advocates and Mr. Sanjiv Kaushik, AE for MCD Mob: 9582055425 Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, SPC for UOI Mob: 9810031680 Email: [email protected]

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶8

¶9

O R D E R 18.09.2025

¶10

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions for restraining the respondent no. 1 from dispossessing the petitioner from the plot bearing no. B-371, forming part of Khasra No. 57/12/1, Southern Portion, situated at Village Karawal Nagar, Illaqa Shahdara, Delhi-110094 . 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as regards the action of demolition taken by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), the petitioner shall seek his remedy before the Appellate Tribunal MCD (“ATMCD”).

¶11

He submits that he has approached this Court only on account of the

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:32:57

¶14

fact that the petitioner is being threatened to be dispossessed from the property under his possession.

¶15

He submits that a civil suit bearing CS(OS) 559/2025 , is pending between the respondent no. 6 and the petitioner, wherein, the respondent no. 6 has filed a suit seeking possession of the property in question. 5. He draws the attention of this Court to the prayer made in the said civil suit filed on behalf of respondent no. 6 herein, and one of the prayers with regard to possession, reads as under:

¶16

“xxx xxx xxx

¶17

(iv) Pass the decree of possession in the favor of plaintiff and against the defendant No. 1 and 2 qua property forming part of Khasra No.57/12/1, Southern Portion, situated at Village Karawal Nagar, Illaqa Shahdara, (facing Yamuna-Puri, Karawal Nagar Road), Delhi-110094, thereby directing the said defendants to hand over the physical and peaceful possession of the suit property to the plaintiff and to hold that the alleged documents of title as are/ were propounded by the Defendants No. 1 & 2 were not lawfully executed by the owner or his alleged attorney for consideration and do not confer any ownership rights in favour of Defendants No.1 & 2 in any manner whatsoever and the Defendants No.1 & 2 may be directed to handover the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit property to the Plaintiff with costs.

¶18

xxx xxx xxx”

¶19

Thus, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is an admitted fact that the petitioner is in possession of the property in question. 7. Responding to the present writ petition, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 6 submits that a civil suit is already pending, wherein, the respondent no. 6 is claiming possession of the property in question. He submits that the respondent no. 6 is the actual owner of the property in question.

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:32:57

¶22

Considering the submissions made before this Court, and without issuing notice in the present matter, it is directed that since a civil suit is pending between the petitioner and respondent no. 6 herein, wherein, the respondent no. 6 has claimed possession over the property in question from the petitioner herein, it is directed that the petitioner herein shall not be dispossessed, without following the due process of law.

¶23

Needless to state, this Court has not gone into the issue of right, title and interest in the property in question.

¶24

It is further directed that the petitioner shall not carry out any further unauthorized construction in the property in question.

¶25

Noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with the pending applications, is disposed of.

¶26

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶27

SEPTEMBER 18, 2025/ ak

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:32:57

Mohd. Asif v. Mr. Parveen Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Asif v. Mr. Parveen Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naraina Jan Kalyan Sudhar Sanghthan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Shri Aman Malik Advocate Vs Union of India and Ors.

Nafeesa Begum Vs the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.

Mr. Anil Kumar Goel Vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- Delhi 10 and Ors.

Krishna Devi and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Prem Colour Chem Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Ashwani Kumar Sarpal Vs the High Court of Delhi

Shanti Amar Singh College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Naraina Jan Kalyan Sudhar Sanghthan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mamta Verma Vs Municipal Corporation Delhi & Anr.

Sushil Khatter & Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Sh. Abdullah Rasheed Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Tauqir Alam Vs Commissioner MCD & Ors.

Tauqir Alam Vs Ashwani Kumar & Ors.