A writ petition was withdrawn at the petitioner's request, with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
HAIMANTI BHATTACHARYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Advocate (appearance not given).
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Umar Hashmi, Mr. Harshit C., Mr. Mayank Upadhyay and Ms. Iqra Shaikh, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 16.10.2025
At the request of Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
OCTOBER 16, 2025
UK/AD/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 12:22:06
HAIMANTI BHATTACHARYA
UNION OF INDIA
R-3
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
