A licensed street vendor, allegedly evicted from his designated vending site by MCD despite a vending certificate, sought directions to vend peacefully. The court disposed of the petition directing him to file a representation with MCD's competent authority, which must decide it within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
MADHURENDRA SAH @ MADHURENDRA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Mr. Aditya and Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Ashish Goyal, SPC with Mr. Anurag Singhal Adv. for R-4 & 5/UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 09.01.2025
II. Pass an order directing the respondents, their officials, their
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:26:55
agents etc. be restrained from harassing the petitioner from peacefully vending at his vending site.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:26:55
the area which had been designated to the petitioner was declared non-vending site and he has referred to para 5 of the status report, which has been filed by the MCD on 21st November, 2024, which reads thus:
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:26:55
petition and the order of this Court, before the competent authority of the MCD, within two weeks, following which the competent authority, taking into account the vending certificate of the petitioner, shall decide the representation and pass an appropriate and reasoned order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks, in accordance with law. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
JANUARY 9, 2025 p
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:26:55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a licensed street vendor removed from his vending site by MCD, should be allowed to vend at his designated site.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Redi Patri Footpath Vikrata Ekata Munch and Ors v South Delhi Municipal Corporation and OrsReferred
W.P.(C) 8066/2021
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Madhurendra Sah @ Madhurendra Singh
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Chandra Dhari Singh
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
