Dismissed¶¶28

Gujarmal Modi Hospital & Research Centre for Medical Sciences v. Competition Commission of India

Delhi HC12 Mar 2025W.P.(C)/13591/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petitions against the Competition Commission of India; reports issued under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 qua hospitals under investigation; petitioners: Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., Lahore Hospital Society, Balaji Medical Diagnostic & Research Centre, Gujarmal Modi Hospital & Research Centre for Medical Sciences; petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to assail the Section 26(1) reports in accordance with law; Delhi High Court, Sachin Datta, J., 12.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to assail the reports issued under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002, in accordance with law. ¶¶28

Gujarmal Modi Hospital & Research Centre for Medical Sciences Vs Competition Commission of India — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~12 to 17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 13588/2022, CM APPL. 41395/2022 MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Mr. Biyanka Bhatia and Ms. Shreya Kapoor, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Advocates.

¶6

¶7

- W.P.(C) 13589/2022, CM APPL. 41397/2022

¶8

LAHORE HOSPITAL SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Mr. Biyanka Bhatia and Ms. Shreya Kapoor, Advocates.

¶9

versus

¶10

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Advocates.

¶11

¶12

- W.P.(C) 13590/2022, CM APPL. 41399/2022 BALAJI MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC & RESEARCH CENTRE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Mr. Biyanka Bhatia and Ms. Shreya Kapoor, Advocates.

¶13

versus

¶14

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Advocates.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:36:39

¶16

¶17

- W.P.(C) 13591/2022, CM APPL. 41401/2022 GUJARMAL MODI HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES.....Petitioner

¶18

Through: Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Mr. Biyanka Bhatia and Ms. Shreya Kapoor, Advocates.

¶19

versus

¶20

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Advocates. 16 + W.P.(C) 13592/2022, CM APPL. 41403/2022 MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Mr. Biyanka Bhatia and Ms. Shreya Kapoor, Advocates.

¶21

versus

¶22

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Advocates. 17 + W.P.(C) 13593/2022, CM APPL. 41405/2022 MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Mr. Biyanka Bhatia and Ms. Shreya Kapoor, Advocates. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Advocates.

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:36:39

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R

¶26

% 12.03.2025

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petitions inasmuch as during the pendency of the present petitions, the respondent has issued separate reports under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 qua each hospital which is the subject matter of the investigation, and also supplied copy of the same to the concerned hospitals.

¶28

While seeking to withdraw the present petitions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to assail the said reports, in accordance with law. 3. In the circumstances, the present petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶29

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶30

MARCH 12, 2025/ at

¶31

Gujarmal Modi Hospital & Research Centre for Medical Sciences v. Competition Commission of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gujarmal Modi Hospital & Research Centre for Medical Sciences v. Competition Commission of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Fone O Clock, through Its Partner, Sh. Paras Sareen Vs Commissioner of Customs-Preventive, New Custom House New Delhi & Anr.

Indianeye Security Private Limited Vs Sh Nawab Ali & Anr.

Swayam Sidha Residents Welfare Association through Its President/ General Secretary Jagdish Prasad Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Ors.

State Bank of India Vs M/S Pp Jewellers Private Limited

Sandeep Vs Lieutenant Governor & Ors.

Babloo Vs Lieutenant Governor & Ors.

Staff Selection Commission and Ors. Vs Km Manju

Deepak Kapoor Vs North Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Ms Laxmi Jewellery Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Director General of Foreign Trade & Ors.

Aditya Institute of Technology through Its Founder-Cum-Chairman Devendra Gupta Vs Lt. Govenor of Delhi & Ors.

Kamlesh Sharma and Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Max Healthcare Institute Ltd. Vs Competition Commission of India

Hng Industries Thozhilalar Nala Sangam Vs Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Ibbi & Ors.

Max Healthcare Institute Ltd. Vs Competition Commission of India