Dismissed

Hav/Gd Jai Bhagwan v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC11 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/13561/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A CRPF havildar removed from service after a departmental enquiry found he had produced a fake 10th standard certificate issued by Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya, which had lost recognition in 1974. The court held the appointment itself was not in accordance with eligibility criteria and declined interference. Petitioner permitted to make a representation for pensionary benefits.

What did the court decide?

None granted; petitioner permitted to make representation for pensionary benefits, to be dealt with by respondents in accordance with law.

Hav/Gd Jai Bhagwan Vs Union of India and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~52

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13561/2018

¶4

HAV/GD JAI BHAGWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Kakkar, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Adv. alongwith Mr. Ajaypal, AC Law CRPF, Mr. Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶8

O R D E R % 11.08.2025

¶9

By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to set aside the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the Commandant-161BN, Central Reserve Police Force (hereinafter referred as “ CRPF ”), whereby the petitioner was removed from service, and the order dated 25.07.2018 passed by the Deputy Inspector General, CRPF, Rampur Range affirming the aforesaid order of removal.

¶10

Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case reveal that the petitioner had appeared in the examination for appointment in CRPF in the year 1991, and upon successfully clearing the same, the petitioner was appointed in CRPF, where he continued to serve from 1991 onwards. Thereafter, in the year 2016, a complaint was filed against the petitioner by one Mr. Ashwani Kumar stating that the petitioner has filed a fake 10^th

¶11

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 1 of 8

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶14

standard certificate to get enrolment in CRPF. The proceedings against the petitioner were initiated by the respondents and a charge-sheet was filed against the petitioner on 18.01.2018. The charge levelled against the petitioner reads as under:-

¶15

That No. 911124677 Hav/GD Jain Bhagwan (D/161) of this BN has depicted misconduct under Sec. 11(1) of CRPF Act 1949 as a member of the Force by producing the fake documents of 10^th St. No. 286, Roll No. 2656 for the year 1990 upon which he was recruited for the post of Sepoy/GD on 08.11.1991, which is against the discipline and rule of force and penal offence under the provisions of Sec. 11(1) of CRPF Act 1949 and Rule 27 of CRPF Rule 1955.”

¶16

An enquiry was initiated against the petitioner vide order dated 07.02.2018. In the course of the departmental inquiry proceedings, the petitioner pleaded ‘ not guilty ’ of the charges. The statement of prosecution witnesses were, thereafter, examined in the presence of petitioner, who was afforded an opportunity to cross-examine them, however, he refused to do so. Subsequently, copies of statements of all the witnesses along with documentary evidences were handed over to the petitioner and he was called upon to produce witnesses in his defence. In response thereto, the petitioner merely submitted an application in his defence.

¶17

Thereafter, the enquiry officer on the basis of the statements of prosecution witnesses and documents found the charge against the petitioner as ‘Proved ’ . Based on the said Inquiry report, the Disciplinary Authority, vide order dated 20.04.2018 removed the petitioner from his services. The relevant extract of the order dated 20.04.2018 reads as under:-

¶18

“3……Finding of the Investigating Officer:-

¶19

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 2 of 8

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶22

(02) The Deputy Inspector of Police, Sansad, Duty Group, CRPF, Kalka Ji, New Delhi has verified the 10^th Standard certificate of Hav/GD, Jai Bhagwan from The University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. In this response a letter has been received vide letter 1-2/2015 (A.M.P.C) dated 19.09.2016 that Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyela was in existence from 1956 to 1974 in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh and on 16.12.1974 the University has change his old name from Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyela to Sampurnanand Sanskrit Vishwavidyela. Varanaseya Sanskrit University of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh is a fake university after the 16.12.1974 and it has been registered in a list of fake university till the present time.

¶23

(03) The verification of education certificate of said personal has been verified by Secretary secondary education council, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh. As per the Secretary secondary education council, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh letter Parishad9/837 dated 05.12.2016 and the Mark Sheet and Certificate of Varanaseya Sanskrit University of Varanasi of dated 16.12.1974 are not valid.

¶24

04) No. 911124677 Hav/GD Jai Bhagwan has been transferred from Sansad Duty Group, CRPF, Kalkaji, New Delhi to 161BN and personal has reported in this BN on 01.07.2017. Afterward shri Manish Saxena Assistant Commandant was appointed for Initial Enquiry yide this office order No. P8-1/2017-161-Est-2 dated 05.07.2017. On the Opinion and recommendation of Investigation Officer, has requested to the Secretary's examination, Varanaseya Sanskrit University, Varanasi for the verification of the said personal's documents vide this office letter no. P8-1/2017-161-Est-2 dated 29.07.2017. Not received any reply has made request to 95 BN for verification of documents of said personal vide letter no. P8-1/2017-161-Est-2 dated 30.11.2017. In response to that due to the response of Commandant-95 BN letter V2-1/16-95-Est-5 dated 26.12.2017, The Examination controller of Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi has informed vide his letter no. 3204/2017 dated 19.12.2017 that the letter no. 1286116 dated 31.08.2016 Verification Number which is issued in the name of Dy. Director police, PDG, CRPF, Kalka Ji, New Delhi has not been issued by the University. Letter No. P8-1/2017-161-BN-2 dated 29.07.2017 this office along with copy of mark sheet through letter no 286 Roll No. 2656 (before the year 1990) upon which Varansai Sanskrit University has been printed, the mark sheet has not been issued from Sampurnand Sanskrit University because Varanasi Sanskrit University, Varanasi was recognized only till the year

¶25

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 3 of 8

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶28

1973 to 74”

¶29

xxx xxx xxx

¶30

07. After the study of departmental investigation and report it is clear that during the investigation personal has not produce any witness or any substantial evidence in his defense and during the investigation, Person has been given a full chance to defend himself. The guilt has been proved against the person. Therefore, keeping in mind the long service of the personnel, the accused No. 911124677. Hav/GD Jai Bhagwan, while using the powers conferred under rule 27 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 read with Section 11. (1) of the CRPF Act 1949, I pass the following orders on departmental investigation:-

¶31

(01) No. 911124677 Hav/GD Jai Bhagwan D/161 is removed from the Force on 20.04.2018 and is also Struck Off strenghth from this date.

¶32

(02) As per the rule of under Sec 12 (1) of CRPF Act 1949, all the medals awarded to No. 911124677 Hav/GD Jai Bhagwan (D/161) are being confiscated………….”

¶33

Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Deputy Inspector General, Rampur Range, which was rejected vide order dated 25.07.2018. The relevant portion of the said order reads as under:-

¶34

“On the opinion and recommendation of Investigating Officer, this office had requested the Secretary Examination, Varanaseya Sanskrit University, Varanasi for the verification of the said personnel’s documents vide letter no. P8-1/2017-161-Est-2 dated 05.07.2017. Upon not receiving verification report, this office has made request to 95 BN for verification of documents of said personnel vide letter no.P8-l/2017-161-Est-2 dated 30.11.2017. In response, through letter of Commandant-95 BN letter V2-l/16-95-Est-5 dated 26.12.2017, the Examination Controller of Sampumanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi has informed vide his letter no. 3204/2017 dated 19.12.2017 that the letter no. 1286116 dated 31.08.2016 Verification Number which is issued in the name of Dy. Director police, PDG, CRPF, Kalkaji, New Delhi has not been issued by the University. Letter No. P8-1/2017-161-BN-2 dated 29.07.2017 this office along with copy of mark sheet through letter no 286 Roll No. 2656 (before the year 1990) upon which Varansai Sanskrit University has been printed, the mark sheet has not been issued from Sampumand Sanskrit University because Varanasi Sanskrit University, Varanasi was recognized only till the year 1973 to 74 whereas the enclosed mark sheet has been issued in 1990. In this manner No. 99924677, Hav/GD, Jai Bhagwan

¶35

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 4 of 8

¶36

This is a digitally signed order.

¶37

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶38

submitted educational certificate no 286 with roll no 2656 (1990) has depicted misconduct by securing enrollment in the CRPF which is against the rules and regulations also punishable under section 11 (1) CRPF Act 1949 and Rule 27 of CRPF Act of 1955.

¶39

xxx xxx xxx

¶40

05. Upon perusal of the appellant's appeal and his record the following facts emerge:-

¶41

01) That, No. 911124677 Hav/GD Jai Bhagwan (D/161) of 161 Bn, C.R.P.F., being a member of the force, has depicted neglect towards duty and misconduct under Section 11(1) of the C.R.P.F. Act, 1949 by producing fake 10^th Standard certificate with Roll No.286 and certificate no-2656 (Poorvmadhyama Year-1990) by which he has enrolled himself in this force, which is against the discipline and rules of the force and are punishable offence under Section 11(1) of the C.R.P.F. Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of the C.R.P.F Rules, 1955. Shri Ashwini Kumar, B-84, Yadav Nagar, Samaypur, Delhi Mob No. 9711011120 has complained about No. 911124677 Hav/GD Jai Bhagwan S/o Shri Ravi Datt, Village - Bhigan, Thana - Murthal, District - Sonipt Haryana vide DG diary no. 2360 dated 13.06.2016 that he is 9^th pass and has been recruited on the basis of10'^ fake mark sheet.

¶42

02) Deputy Inspector of Police, Sansad, Duty Group, CRPF, Kalka Ji, New Delhi has verified the 10^th Standard certificate of Hav/GD, Jai Bhagwan from The University Grants Commission , Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, in reply to which, a letter was received vide letter no. 1-2/2015 (A.M.P.C) dated 19.09.2016 that Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya was in existence from 1956 to 1974 in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh and on 16.12.1974 the university has changed its name from Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyela to Sampurnanand Sanskrit Vishwavidyela. Varanaseya Sanskrit University of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh is a fake university after the 16.12.1974 and it has been registered in the list of fake universities till the present time.

¶43

03) The verification of education certificate of the said personnel was also verified by Secretary Secondary Education Council, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh. As per the Secretary Secondary Education Council, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh letter Parishad- 9/837 dated 05.12.2016, the said personnel’s Mark Sheet and Certificate of Varanaseya Sanskrit University of Varanasi of dated 16.12.1974 were not valid.”

¶44

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 5 of 8

¶45

This is a digitally signed order.

¶46

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶47

Thereafter, the petitioner filed a revision petition before Director General CRPF and Inspector General of Police, Dehradun Sector which too was rejected vide order dated 28.01.2019 and the findings of the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority was maintained.

¶48

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner was unaware of the fact that the University from which he obtained matriculation certificate was not recognised. He states that the petitioner served the force diligently from 1991 till his removal from service, i.e. 20.04.2018. He further states that after putting 27 years of blemishless service, the petitioner ought not have been removed from service. Lastly learned counsel for petitioner submits that without prejudice to his rights, the petitioner is willing to forgo the reliefs qua removal, if the pensionary benefits are granted to him.

¶49

Per contra , learned counsel for the respondents states that since the petitioner has given a certificate which is not valid in the eyes of law, he is not entitled to any indulgence from this Court. To buttress her contentions, learned counsel for the respondent places reliance on M/s. Indian Oil Corporation v. Sh. Rajender D. Halmalkar, (2022 SCC OnLine SC 486). 9. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 10. As per records, the minimum educational qualifications required for appointment to the post of Constable in CRPF is matriculation and above. Though the petitioner has furnished a matriculation certificate issued by Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya issued in the year of 1990, however, the material on records indicate that Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya had been recognized only up to year 1974. Therefore, it is evident the certificate was issued from a University which had lost

¶50

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 6 of 8

¶51

This is a digitally signed order.

¶52

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶53

recognition post 1974.

¶54

The material on record also indicates that during the enquiry proceeding, it has come on record that after Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya lost its recognition, Sampurnanand Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya was the University which was recognised to give matriculation certificates. A perusal of the documents shows that the petitioner's certificate and marksheet were issued by an institution which was otherwise not recognised.

¶55

In view of the above, the petitioner’s entry into the service was not proper and in accordance with the prescribed eligibility criteria. The plea of the petitioner that he was not aware that the University had not recognised cannot be accepted. The petitioner cannot be given any benefit of an appointment which, had the facts about non-recognition been known, would not have been granted to him. The issue herein is of not having any intention or mens rea to cheat, but of producing a certificate which is otherwise not valid in the eyes of law.

¶56

In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the office of the Commandant-161BN, CRPF and the order dated 25.07.2018 passed by the Deputy Inspector General, CRPF, Rampur range. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed.

¶57

In view of the fact that since the petitioner had already served about 27 years of unblemished service, the counsel for the petitioner prays that he should be permitted to give a representation to the respondents to consider as to whether the petitioner may be granted pensionary benefits. 15. Without commenting as to whether the petitioner is entitled to such

¶58

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 7 of 8

¶59

This is a digitally signed order.

¶60

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

¶61

a relief or not, it is always open for the petitioner to make a representation and if any representation is made, the respondents shall deal with it in accordance with law.

¶62

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.

¶63

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

¶64

AUGUST 11, 2025/ bh

¶65

W.P.(C) 13561/2018 Page 8 of 8

¶66

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:16:18

Hav/Gd Jai Bhagwan v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hav/Gd Jai Bhagwan v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Singh Vs the Regional Labour Commissioner Central & Anr.

Manoj Chauhan Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5 & Anr.

Quattro Realcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Acit Circle 19(1), Delhi

Sangeeta Negi Vs Bharti Public School, through Its Manager & Ors.

Mr Deepak Duggal Vs Delhi Development Authority

Kings Dorian Exports Vs Irfan

M/S Elementto Lifestyles Vs Mr. Deepak Singh Bora

Santosh Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Ashok Kumar

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Dheer Singh

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Sh Ram Kishan

Badan Singh Vs Director General, Indo Tibetan Border Police Force & Ors.

Prahlad Arya Vs Prudence School Dwarka and Ors.

The Management of Patel Integrated Logistics Limited Vs Satbir Singh & Anr.