Vayudoot Multi Services Private Ltd. v. Rajesh Rathore
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition and related applications were dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
The petition and related applications were dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
VAYUDOOT MULTI SERVICES PRIVATE LTD .....Petitioner
versus
RAJESH RATHORE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Dwivedi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
% 14.01.2025
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] W.P.(C) 13501/2024, CM APPL.1944/2025 (for condonation of delay of 213 days in filing) & CM APPL. 56471/2024 (interim relief)
Since none appears for petitioner, the petition and the pending applications are dismissed in default.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
JANUARY 14, 2025/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:27:13
VAYUDOOT MULTI SERVICES PRIVATE LTD
RAJESH RATHORE
GIRISH KATHPALIA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court