The High Court of Delhi disposed of the certiorari petition involving a contractual dispute, granting liberty to withdraw as the parties had amicably settled and the petitioner had received a banker's cheque.
Liberty granted to withdraw the petition; order disposed of as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
SH. SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mansi Sharma, Adv. with Petitioner in person.
versus
M/S NDPL AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. for R1. Mr. Naman Saraswat, Adv. for R-2 with Mr. Navroze Palekar, Vice President and global Head of Respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
2.1 Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 undertakes that the cheque shall be honoured on presentation.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 7.09.2025 16:14:58
W.P.(C) 13337/2019 Page 1 of 2
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SEPTEMBER 24, 2025/ sr
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 7.09.2025 16:14:58
W.P.(C) 13337/2019 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the certiorari petition should be disposed of upon the parties' settlement and withdrawal.
SH. SURESH KUMAR
M/S NDPL AND ANR
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
