Disposed¶22

Global Glass Tecnologies Private Limited v. Union Bank of India & Ors.

Delhi HC25 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/12916/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court writ petition disposed (25.08.2025) — Global Glass Technologies Private Limited sought expedited disposal of Regular Appeal No. 22 of 2025 pending before DRAT and interim relief; delay attributed to previous Presiding Officer DRAT Delhi (twelve hearings not taken up); Central Government authorised PO DRAT Calcutta after resignation of Delhi PO; Petitioner given liberty to apply to DRAT Calcutta for early listing; Articles 226 and 227; Union Bank of India among respondents; no interim relief granted.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief granted; the Petitioner was advised it may file an appropriate application before the learned DRAT, Calcutta, for early listing of the case. ¶22

Global Glass Tecnologies Private Limited Vs Union… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief granted; the Petitioner was advised it may file an appropriate application before the learned DRAT, Calcutta, for early listing of the case.

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether a direction should issue to the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) to hear and dispose of Regular Appeal No. 22 of 2025 expeditiously, preferably within a time frame of three months. +1 more

¶15

Court's answer

The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the Petitioner, if so advised, may file an appropriate application before the learned DRAT, Calcutta, for an early listing of the case.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

In lieu of granting the interim reliefs sought, the Court noted that the Central Government has authorised the learned Presiding Officer, DRAT, Calcutta to take up the matters, and disposed of the petition directing the Petitioner to seek early listing from DRAT, Calcutta; no separate interim relief was granted by this Court.

¶21

Key takeaways

The writ petition, along with pending applications, if any, is disposed of.ratio¶22
CM APPL.52797/2025 and CM APPL.52798/2025 (exemption applications) are allowed, subject to all just exceptions, and stand disposed of.ratio¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Anil Kshetarpal & Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, JJ., order dated 25.08.2025) disposed of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by Global Glass Technologies Private Limited seeking a direction to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) to hear and dispose of Regular Appeal No. 22 of 2025 expeditiously and to grant interim reliefs till its disposal. The Petitioner's grievance was that the previous learned Presiding Officer, DRAT, Delhi, had not taken up the matter for the last twelve hearings, while the next hearing stood fixed for 18.09.2025. Noting that the Central Government has authorised the learned Presiding Officer, DRAT, Calcutta, to take up the matters owing to the resignation of the learned Presiding Officer at Delhi, the Court observed that the Petitioner, if so advised, may file an appropriate application before DRAT, Calcutta for early listing. The writ petition, along with pending applications, was disposed of; separate exemption applications were allowed subject to all just exceptions. No interim relief was granted by the Court.

¶1

$~57

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12916/2025 & CM APPL. 52796/2025 (For Stay)

¶4

GLOBAL GLASS TECNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Shubham Kulshreshtha and Mr. Satya Rath, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Mr. Sandeep Soni, Mr. Vishnu Jaiswal, Mr. Adarsh Raj Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh and Mr. Sumit Chanchal, Advocates for Respondent No. 2

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶10

O R D E R % 25.08.2025

¶11

CM APPL.52797/2025 (For Exemption.) & CM APPL.52798/2025 (For Ex.)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The applications stand disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 12916/2025 & CM APPL. 52796/2025 (For Stay)

¶15

The instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal [“ DRAT ”] to hear and dispose of the Regular Appeal bearing No. 22 of 2025 expeditiously,

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2025 at 12:30:29

¶18

and to grant appropriate interim reliefs till the disposal of the aforesaid Appeal, preferably within a time frame of three months.

¶19

It is admitted that an Appeal filed by the Appellant is pending before the learned DRAT, and the next date of hearing for the same is 18.09.2025. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the previous learned Presiding Officer, DRAT, Delhi, had not taken up the matter for the last twelve hearings.

¶20

As per available information, the Central Government has already authorised the learned Presiding Officer, DRAT, Calcutta, to take up the matters, owing to the resignation of the learned Presiding Officer at Delhi.

¶21

Hence, the petition is disposed of with the observation that the Petitioner, if so advised, may file an appropriate application before the learned DRAT, Calcutta, for an early listing of the case.

¶22

The writ petition, along with pending applications, if any, is disposed of.

¶23

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶24

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 25, 2025/nd/va

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2025 at 12:30:29

Global Glass Tecnologies Private Limited v. Union Bank of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Global Glass Tecnologies Private Limited v. Union Bank of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Gupta Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

M/S Sopan Restaurant Vs Union of India & Ors.

A.R. Institute of Management and Technology Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Jatinder Pal Singh Kohli & Anr. Vs the Commissioner MCD of Delhi & Ors.

M/S Centro De Estudios De Materiales Y Control De Obra S.A. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Subhash Chandra Alias Subhash Chandra Gautam Vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.

Bsl Anadhishashi Kramchari Sangh & Anr. Vs Steel Authority of India Limited & Ors.

M/S S K Enterprises Vs Principal Commissioner Cgst & Anr.

Prakaram Land and Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bank of Baroda and Ors.

Prakaram Land and Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bank of Baroda and Ors.

Gurjeet Singh Vs Rajender Kaur

Manoj Kumar Vs Priyanka & Anr.

Sansadiya Adhikari Welfare Society(Saws) through Secretary Vs Mayank Srivastav

Shivam Pawar Vs Priya Rani