Ms Kalthia Engineering and Construction Limited Vs Chief Engineer National Highways Division Public Works Department Maharashtra

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2025 at 12:38:54

¶20

permitted the respondent to place on record its counter-claim/s belatedly vide order dated 01.07.2025, even after the conclusion of the final arguments by the petitioner.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 09.02.2025, the petitioner concluded its final arguments; thereafter, the respondent on 11.06.2025 sought to file their counter-claim. The petitioner promptly raised objections as to the maintainability of such counter-claim/s after conclusion of the final arguments.

¶22

Upon hearing both parties, the learned Arbitral Tribunal, by the aforesaid order, allowed the application filed by the respondent and directed that the counter-claim be taken on record. 7. The learned counsel for the petitioner apprises that the Arbitral Tribunal has the powers to entertain the counter-claim as per law laid down in Ashok Kumar Kalra vs. Wing CDR. Surendra Agnihotri and others, (2020) 2 SCC 394 , but only in exceptional circumstances, whereby entertaining the counter-claim is a discretionary power but such powers can only be exercised till the stage of commencement of recording of evidence. The relevant portion of the aforesaid judgment reads as under:

¶23

“Having considered the previous judgments of this Court on counterclaims, (the language employed in the rules related thereto, as well as the intention of the legislature, I conclude that it is not mandatory for a counterclaim to be filed along with the written statement. The court, in its discretion, may allow a counterclaim to be filed after the filing of the written statement, in view of the considerations mentioned in the preceding paragraph. However, propriety requires that such discretion should ordinarily be exercised to allow the filing of a counterclaim till the framing of issues for trial. To this extent, I concur with the conclusion reached by my learned Brothers. However, for the reasons stated above, I am of the view that in exceptional circumstances, a counterclaim may be permitted to be filed after a written statement till the stage of commencement of recording of the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff.”

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2025 at 12:38:54

¶26

Given the extremely narrow limits of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India qua arbitral proceedings, this Court is not inclined to interdict with any order passed by the learned arbitral tribunal or interfere with the conduct of arbitral proceedings.¹ This is especially since the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate statutory remedies as prescribed in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the A&C Act’ ), including taking recourse to moving an application under Section 16 of the A&C Act, and/or filing a petition under Section 34 of the A&C Act, at the appropriate stage.

¶27

In the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. The same is, consequently, dismissed. Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the case of the parties in arbitration proceedings.

¶28

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶29

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶30

AUGUST 25, 2025/ys

¶31

1 Bhaven Constructions vs Executive Engineer, Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited and Anr ., (2022) 1 SCC 75; Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Ors., 2025 SCC OnLine Del 319; Surender Kumar Singhal and Ors. vs Arun Kumar Bhalotia and Ors ., 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3708.

¶32

This is a digitally signed order.

¶33

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2025 at 12:38:54

Ms Kalthia Engineering and Construction Limited v. Chief Engineer National Highways Division Public Works Department Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Kalthia Engineering and Construction Limited v. Chief Engineer National Highways Division Public Works Department Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Gupta Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

M/S Sopan Restaurant Vs Union of India & Ors.

A.R. Institute of Management and Technology Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Jatinder Pal Singh Kohli & Anr. Vs the Commissioner MCD of Delhi & Ors.

M/S Centro De Estudios De Materiales Y Control De Obra S.A. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Subhash Chandra Alias Subhash Chandra Gautam Vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.

Bsl Anadhishashi Kramchari Sangh & Anr. Vs Steel Authority of India Limited & Ors.

M/S S K Enterprises Vs Principal Commissioner Cgst & Anr.

Hardeep Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shanker Kumar Gupta Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Hsiung Yu Mei Vs Union of India & Ors.

University of Delhi Vs Sanjay Singh and Anr.

University of Delhi Vs Mohd Irsad and Anr.

University of Delhi Vs Neeraj & Anr.