Writ petition seeking direction to examine insurance claims and decide them, which had not been done for want of documentation. Petitioner supplied documents; respondent insurer agreed to examine the claims. Court directed a decision within three months; petition not pressed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
versus
OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC alongwith Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Rajkumar Maurya and Ms. Tanisha Samanta, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Abhishek Nanda and Ms. Falguni Bajpai, Advocates for R3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 10.02.2025
CM APPL. 7878/2025
W.P.(C) 12554/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:54:06
documentation.
SACHIN DATTA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2025/ at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:54:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents could be directed to examine the petitioner's insurance claims and take a decision on the documents submitted?
Integrated Supply Chain Solution
Office of the Insurance Ombudsman
New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
