Petitioner sought to withdraw his writ petition against the Income Tax Officer; counsel stated he had instructions to withdraw, and the court dismissed the petition along with the pending application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Milind Gautam, Adv.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 49(1), DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R % 09.10.2025
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
OCTOBER 9, 2025 /sr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2025 at 13:07:36
RAKESH JAIN
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 49(1), DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
