1 $~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW…
Liberty to revive proceedings granted if Ombudsman's fresh consideration results in same finding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
VIJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. Versus RBI OMBUDSMAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma with Mr. Dipan Sethi and Mr. Snehashish, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Sumit Geol with Ms. Sreeparna Basak and Ms. Apurba Pattanayak, Advocates for respondent No.2.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 09.01.2025
W.P.(C) 12330/2024
1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:43:20
to revive the proceedings in case the result still remains the same.
MANOJ JAIN, J
JANUARY 9, 2025 st
W.P.(C) 12330/2024
2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:43:20
VIJAY GUPTA
RBI OMBUDSMAN
ANR
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
