Two civil revision petitions filed by the petitioner were listed; no one appeared for the petitioner, and respondents' counsel stated the underlying suit had already been decreed in the petitioner's favour. The court held the petitions infructuous and disposed of them accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BRIHAM LAL .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
SMT POONAM NARULA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Adv. through V.C.
BRIHAM LAL .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
SMT POONAM NARULA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Adv. through V.C.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 23.01.2025
suit has already been decreed in favour of the petitioner.
infructuous and are disposed of accordingly.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 23, 2025 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:54:54
Briham Lal
Smt Poonam Narula
Anr.
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
