Dismissed

Mrs. Ridhi Virmani v. New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) & Ors.

Delhi HC13 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/12177/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking removal of unauthorized shops, the High Court of Delhi held that the petitioner had not exhausted remedies. The court directed the party to approach the concerned authority via representation within a fortnight before disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to approach the concerned authority after making a detailed representation within a fortnight.

Mrs. Ridhi Virmani Vs New Delhi Municipal… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~49

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12177/2025 & CM APPL. 49658/2025

¶4

MRS. RIDHI VIRMANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC) & ORS.

¶7

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ayush Gandhi and Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate with Ms. Ishika Jain and Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, CGSC with Mr. Vatsal Tripathi, Advocate.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶9

O R D E R % 13.08.2025

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

By instituting the proceedings of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a prayer has been made for issuing an appropriate direction to the respondents to immediately seal/remove and demolish all unauthorized tin/temporary shops which have sprung up on the public passage way and land under/abutting AIIMS Delhi Metro Station and adjacent running highway.

¶12

The said direction has been sought in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Supertech Ltd. vs. Emerald Court Owner

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:39:24

¶15

Resident Welfare Association, (2021) 10 SCC 1 .

¶16

Before approaching this Court with the aforesaid prayer, the petitioner has not approached the authority concerned which is entrusted to take appropriate measures in case any unauthorized shop on public passage is raised.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid, we permit the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for redressal of his grievances by way of making a detailed representation taking all the pleas which may be available to him and enclosing therein all the documents on which he intends to rely. The said representation shall be made within a fortnight from today. Once any such representation is made, the same shall be attended to and appropriate decision and action which may be warranted under law shall also be taken with expedition.

¶18

The writ petition thus stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶19

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶20

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶21

AUGUST 13, 2025 yrj

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:39:24

Mrs. Ridhi Virmani v. New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Ridhi Virmani v. New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Deepak Duggal Vs Delhi Development Authority

Kings Dorian Exports Vs Irfan

M/S Elementto Lifestyles Vs Mr. Deepak Singh Bora

Santosh Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Bls International Services Limited Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Gvr Infra Projects Limited & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Tpf Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Tpf Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Hmm Altis Jv Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mkss Infra Engicon Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Highways Infrastructure and Development Corporation and Ors.

Jain Asli Shikanji Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Highway Authority of India

Aditya Institute of Technology through Its Founder-Cum-Chairman Devendra Gupta Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

M/S. Ceigall India Limited Vs National Highway Authority of India & Anr.

Aman Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi Thorugh Its Commissioner & Ors.