The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition, after which it was allowed to be filed again on appropriate pleadings.
Withdrawal permitted with liberty to file a fresh petition; subsequent petitions allowed on appropriate pleadings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC and Mr. Sunil, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
AUGUST 13, 2025 yrj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:39:26
ADVOCATE MANISH KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
