Revision petition under Section 115 CPC against orders in execution proceedings was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to raise contentions before the Executing Court; parties' rights left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
AVINASH SINGH JAWA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advocate. versus
SHEKHAR KHANNA .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
CM APPL. 2871/2025 [Exemption from filing certified copies]
C.R.P. 12/2025 & CM APPL. 2870/2025 [Stay]
C.R.P. 12/2025 Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Da te:1 8.01.2025 00:06:19
proceedings filed by the Respondent to enforce the decree passed.
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JANUARY 17, 2025/pa
Signature Not Verified
C.R.P. 12/2025 Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Da te:1 8.01.2025 00:06:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition challenging the Executing Court's orders in execution proceedings should be entertained.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
AVINASH SINGH JAWA
SHEKHAR KHANNA
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
