Muskan v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner at counsel's request; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without adjudication.
What the court decided
$~64
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 11734/2025, CM APPL. 48028/2025 & CM APPL. 48029/2025
MUSKAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Rai, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Arnav Mittal,GP and Mr. Akash Mishra, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates for R-2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 06.08.2025
- Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the present writ petition.
- Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muskan
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court