An interim relief and direction application in a writ petition was sought to be withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to file a fresh petition; the Court rejected the application granting the liberty prayed for.
Application withdrawn; liberty granted to institute a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~88
CENTRE FOR YOUTH CULTURE LAW AND ENVIRONMENT AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Paras Tyagi and Mr. Aditya Tanwar (Petitioners in person).
versus
CHIEF SECRETARY OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Standing Counsel for Delhi Cantonment Board/R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 03.12.2025
CM APPL. 76037/2025 (Direction and Interim Relief)
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
DECEMBER 3, 2025 kct
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:12:28
Centre for Youth Culture Law and Environment
Chief Secretary of Delhi & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
