Writ petition by a naval officer against the Union of India was withdrawn at the petitioner's request after some hearing; the court dismissed it as withdrawn without expressing any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~92
CDR. ANNIE NAGARAJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Nikhil Palli, Ms Niyati Razdan, Mr. Vaidushya Parth and Ms Bhavya Sharma, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
% 05.08.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, Mr. Palli, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the matter.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
AUGUST 5, 2025/ yg
W.P.(C) 11675/2025
Page 1 of 1
Cdr. Annie Nagaraja
Union of India & Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
