Dr. Prakash Ranjan and Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

¶1

$~56

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11646/2025, CM APPL. 47644/2025 & CM APPL. 47645/2025

¶4

DR. PRAKASH RANJAN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amar Nath Saini and Mr. Karan Gupta, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 05.08.2025

¶10

Issue notice. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶11

The petitioners, 221 in number, are all doctors who were engaged on a contractual basis to work in Aam Aadmi Mohalla Clinics [“AAMC”] under the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi [“GNCTD”]. Their engagement between the year 2016 and 2025 has been extended from time to time. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek directions against their termination and replacement with other contractual employees. The reliefs sought are in the following terms:

¶12

“(a) To restrain the Respondents from illegal termination of the

¶13

W.P.(C) 11646/2025 Page 1 of 3

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:35:51

¶16

contractual / empanelment / ad-hoc / daily basis employment as Doctors of the Petitioners with Aam Aadmi Mohalla Clinics (AAMCs) and Ayushman Arogya Mandir (AAM) to replace them with the same set of contractual / empanelment / ad-hoc / daily basis employment as Doctors.

¶17

(b) Pass any other order/s or directions/s which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances stated above.”

¶18

In the writ petition, it is contended that AAMC has been replaced with the establishment of Ayushman Arogya Mandir [“AAM”]. By an Office Order dated 14.05.2025, it was directed that the existing doctors and paramedical staff under AAMC would continue under the existing terms and conditions until 31.03.2026 or until new manpower for AAM is appointed to serve areas currently covered by the Mohalla Clinics , whichever is earlier.

¶19

A copy of the Agreement signed between each of the doctors and GNCTD, to this effect, has been annexed as Annexure P-4 to the writ petition. It provides for empanelment of a doctor until 31.03.2026 or until new manpower for AAM is appointed.

¶20

It is submitted by Mr. Amar Nath Saini, learned counsel for the petitioners, that at present, none of the petitioners have received any notice of termination. Further, neither have any advertisements been issued for the recruitment of manpower in AAM, nor have any appointments been made.

¶21

Having regard to this factual situation, I am of the view that it is not necessary, at this stage, to entertain this writ petition on merits. However, in the event the respondents propose to terminate the petitioners’ engagement before 31.03.2026, on the ground that new manpower has been engaged for AAM, they are directed to give two

¶22

W.P.(C) 11646/2025 Page 2 of 3

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:35:51

¶25

weeks’ notice to the concerned doctors.

¶26

The writ petition, alongwith pending applications, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

All rights and contentions of the parties remain reserved.

¶28

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶29

AUGUST 5, 2025 SS/KA/

¶30

W.P.(C) 11646/2025 Page 3 of 3

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:35:51

Dr. Prakash Ranjan and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Prakash Ranjan and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mrs Rajlakshmi Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. Vs Pankaj Shakya

M/S Nrs Catering Unit Vs Union of India & Ors.

Indira Menon Vs Delhi Police Licensing Department

Lt Col Samir Kumar Singh Vs Army Group Insurance Fund and Ors.

Manisha Sejwal Vs Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board & Anr.

Samast Jawala Heri Gaon Residents Welfare Association (Regd.) Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Manish Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mrs Rajlakshmi Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Kavita Devi Vs Delhi Sanskrit Academy & Ors.

Laxman Singh & Ors. Vs the Government of NCT of Delhi through Sdm Tehsil Kapashera Delhi & Anr.

Yogendra Pratap Singh Vs Airports Authority of India and Ors.

Sarfraz Ahmad Vs the Vice Chancellor ,Jmi and Ors.