Dismissed¶33

Om Hydro Power Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/11619/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delay and laches; stale claim; discretionary refusal of writ relief under Article 226 for inordinate unexplained delay; Central Financial Assistance (CFA) for Small Hydro Power projects; Ministry of New & Renewable Energy OM dated 13.05.2019 cancelling CFA and closing files of 53 SHP projects; petitioner at S. No. 30; OM dated 26.05.2025 release of balance CFA; no fresh cause of action; State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors vs Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors AIR 1987 SC 251; P.S. Sadasivaswamy vs The State of Tamil Nadu 1974 AIR 2271; W.P.(C) 11619/2025; High Court of Delhi; Sachin Datta, J.; decided 05.08.2025; petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The petition suffers from delay and laches because the petitioner took no steps to contemporaneously assail the OM dated 13.05.2019 by which its CFA entitlement was cancelled. ¶22

Om Hydro Power Limited Vs Union of India & Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition challenging the OM dated 13.05.2019 cancelling the petitioner's Central Financial Assistance is barred by delay and laches, having been filed without any contemporaneous challenge to that OM. +1 more

¶22

Court's answer

The petition suffers from delay and laches because the petitioner took no steps to contemporaneously assail the OM dated 13.05.2019 by which its CFA entitlement was cancelled.

¶22

Ratio / Principle

The OM dated 26.05.2025 has no impact on the petitioner's entitlement, since the petitioner stood excluded from the purview of CFA vide OM dated 13.05.2019, and therefore cannot furnish any fresh cause of action to assail the OM dated 13.05.2019.

¶24

Key takeaways

In light of the settled principles on delay in exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the petition, being clearly barred on account of significant delay and laches, is dismissed.ratio¶33

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition (W.P.(C) 11619/2025, High Court of Delhi, Sachin Datta, J., decided 05.08.2025) — Delay and laches. The petitioner challenged the Office Memorandum dated 13.05.2019 of the Ministry of New & Renewable Energy (Small Hydro Power Division) whereby the files of 53 Small Hydro Power projects, including the petitioner's (at S. No. 30), were closed and its Central Financial Assistance (CFA) cancelled for non-compliance with the Administrative Approval provisions and non-submission of progress reports. The petition was filed only in 2025 with no contemporaneous challenge to the 2019 OM and was held to suffer from clear delay and laches. The court further held that the subsequent OM dated 26.05.2025, concerning release of balance CFA to eligible projects, had no impact on the petitioner's exclusion and could not furnish a fresh cause of action. Relying on State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors vs Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors, AIR 1987 SC 251, and P.S. Sadasivaswamy vs The State of Tamil Nadu, 1974 AIR 2271, on the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where claims are stale, the petition was dismissed.

¶1

$~88

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision : 05.08.2025

¶4

- W.P.(C) 11619/2025

¶5

OM HYDRO POWER LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divya Singh, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arnav Kumar, CGSC alongwith Ms. Himani Yadav, Advocates for R1 and R2.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

¶10

^{SACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral)}

¶11

The present petitioner has been filed by the petitioner assailing an Office Memorandum dated 13.05.2019 (hereinafter “ OM dated 19.05.2019” ) whereby a decision was taken not to extend the Central Financial Assistance (CFA) to the petitioner. The petitioner ’ s entitlement to the CFA was expressly cancelled vide the said OM which reads as under:

¶12

“No. 287/18/2019-SHP Government of India Ministry of New & Renewable Energy (Small Hydro Power Division)

¶13

Block No: 14, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110003 Dated: 13.05.2019.

¶14

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

¶15

Subject: Cancellation of the proposals submitted to the Ministry for Central Financial Assistance (CFA) for setting up of Small Hydro Power projects in private sector.

¶16

Signature Not Verified

¶17

W.P.(C) 11619/2025 Page 1 of 3

¶18

Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Da te:0 7.08.2025 17:34:08

¶19

The undersigned is directed to convey the decision of the Ministry to close the files pertaining to 53 Small Hydro Power projects, the list of which are annexed herewith, in view of non-compliance of the provisions contained in the Administrative Approval of SHP schemes circulated vide letter No. No. 14(5)/2003-SHP dated 29.7.2003 and vide letter No. 14/(1)2008-SHP dated 11 .12.2009.

¶20

2. It is further conveyed that no correspondence in this regard will henceforth be entertained, as the project developers had not submitted any progress report of their project execution after submission of application for providing Central Financial Assistance.

¶21

3. This issues with the approval of the competent authority in this Ministry.”

¶22

The OM clearly records that the petitioner ’ s name appears at S. No. 30 in the list of projects appended to the aforesaid OM. As stated in the OM, the reason for cancellation/withdrawal of CFA was that the concerned project developer has not submitted any progress report of their project execution after submission of application for providing CFA. No steps were taken by the petitioner to contemporaneously assail the aforesaid OM dated 13.05.2019. As such, the present petition clearly suffers from delay and latches.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to rely upon the Office Memorandum dated 26.05.2025 (hereinafter “ OM dated 26.05.2025” ) which makes certain changes for the purpose of release of balance CFA to the projects that are eligible for the same. It is sought to be contended that the same affords a cause of action to the petitioner.

¶24

The aforesaid OM dated 26.05.2025 has no impact on the entitlement of the petitioner since the petitioner was excluded from the purview of CFA vide OM dated 13.05.2019. As such, OM dated 26.05.2025 cannot furnish any fresh cause of action to the petitioner to assail OM dated 13.05.2019.

¶25

In State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors vs Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors , AIR

¶26

Signature Not Verified

¶27

W.P.(C) 11619/2025 Page 2 of 3

¶28

Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Da te:0 7.08.2025 17:34:08

¶29

1987 SC 251, the Supreme Court observed as under :

¶30

“It is well settled that the power of the High Court to issue an appropriate writ under Art. 226 of the Constitution is discretionary and the High Court in the exercise of its discretion does not ordinarily assist the tardy and the indolent or the acquiescent and the lethargic. If there is inordinate delay on the part of the petitioner in filing a writ petition and such delay is not satisfactory explained, the High Court may decline to intervene and grant relief in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction”.

¶31

6. Further, the Supreme Court in P.S. Sadasivaswamy vs The State of Tamil Nadu , 1974 AIR 2271, stated that :

¶32

“It is not that there is any period of limitation for the Courts to exercise their powers under Article 226 nor is it that there can never be a case where the Courts cannot interfere in a matter after the passage of a certain length of time. But it would be a sound and wise exercise of discretion for the Courts to refuse to exercise their extra-ordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who stand by and allow things to happen and then approach the Court to put forward stale claims and try to unsettle settled matters”

¶33

In light of the above, the present petition, being clearly barred on account of significant delay and latches, is dismissed.

¶34

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶35

AUGUST 5, 2025/ at

¶36

Signature Not Verified

¶37

W.P.(C) 11619/2025 Page 3 of 3

¶38

Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Da te:0 7.08.2025 17:34:08

Om Hydro Power Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Hydro Power Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mrs Rajlakshmi Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. Vs Pankaj Shakya

M/S Nrs Catering Unit Vs Union of India & Ors.

Indira Menon Vs Delhi Police Licensing Department

Lt Col Samir Kumar Singh Vs Army Group Insurance Fund and Ors.

Manisha Sejwal Vs Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board & Anr.

Samast Jawala Heri Gaon Residents Welfare Association (Regd.) Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Mrs Rani Mehra Vs M/S Logix Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Param Pure Edible Oil Pvt. Ltd. Hrough Its Director Vs Honble Lieutenant Governor and Ors.

M/S Swisline Inter Trade Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement

Swati Saista Vs the Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jamia Teachers Association Vs Jamia Millia Islamia

Master Devarsh Jain and Anr. Vs Delhi Medical Council & Ors.