Disposed

Gulnoz Yakubova v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC11 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/11038/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pending W.P.(C) 11038/2025 seeking Emergency Travel Certificate to Uzbekistan. Court noted diplomatic intervention initiated. Held exit permit issuance possible once travel documents secured, relaxing NOC requirement.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of. No N.O.C. from Trial Court required for exit permit; petitioner to apply to FRRO for exit permit after obtaining travel documents from Embassy.

Gulnoz Yakubova Vs Union of India and Ors. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11038/2025

¶4

GULNOZ YAKUBOVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Jha, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms. Shreya M, Advs. for UoI.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 11.08.2025

¶9

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking issuance of an Emergency Travel Certificate to enable her to travel to her home country i.e. Uzbekistan.

¶10

The order dated 29.07.2025 took note of the peculiar circumstances afflicting the petitioner which impelled the petitioner to approach this Court. Today, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that a communication was sent by the Ministry of External Affairs to the Embassy of Republic of Uzbekistan seeking diplomatic intervention for issuance of travel document in favour of the petitioner, to enable the petitioner to travel back to her home country i.e. Uzbekistan. The Embassy of Uzbekistan has been requested to issue the necessary travel documents to facilitate the petitioner’s immediate repatriation to Uzbekistan.

¶11

Learned counsel for respondents further submits, on instructions, that upon the issuance of the emergency travel documents by the Embassy of

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 14:01:35

¶14

Uzbekistan, the petitioner would be at liberty to apply to the FRRO, Delhi for an exit permit, which shall be processed and expedited as soon as the same is submitted by the petitioner.

¶15

It is further submitted on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, that in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the respondents would not insist upon an NOC from the concerned Trial Court (where the cases pertaining to the petitioner are pending), as a pre-condition for issuance of the exit permit. Instead, the department would duly inform the investigating agencies in this regard.

¶16

In the circumstances, there would be no impediment in issuance of the requisite exit permit to the petitioner as and when the petitioner obtains the travel documents from the Embassy of her home country i.e. Uzbekistan.

¶17

The above redresses the grievance of the petitioner in the present petition.

¶18

The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶19

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶20

AUGUST 11, 2025/ at

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 14:01:35

Gulnoz Yakubova v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulnoz Yakubova v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Singh Vs the Regional Labour Commissioner Central & Anr.

Manoj Chauhan Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5 & Anr.

Quattro Realcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Acit Circle 19(1), Delhi

Sangeeta Negi Vs Bharti Public School, through Its Manager & Ors.

Mr Deepak Duggal Vs Delhi Development Authority

Kings Dorian Exports Vs Irfan

M/S Elementto Lifestyles Vs Mr. Deepak Singh Bora

Santosh Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Indira Menon Vs Delhi Police Licensing Department

Satya Prakash Ravidas Vs the Secretary Bar Council of Delhi & Anr.

Mundeshwari Construction Vs National Building Construction Corporation Limited

Laxmi Sharma Vs Union of India & Anr.

Pnc Infratech Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Smt Krishna Devi Vs State (Gnctd) and Ors.