Dismissed¶¶14

Ramesh Thanwardass v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC9 May 2025W.P.(C)/10484/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-prosecution dismissal; writ petition W.P.(C) 10484/2016 with CM APPLs 653/2017, 29883/2018, 29894/2018, 17212/2025; petitioner absent on successive hearings (06.12.2024 adjournment/final opportunity, 06.03.2025 no appearance, 09.05.2025 no appearance); counsel's discharge application; unserved notice of default (25.03.2025); Delhi High Court; Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri; order dated 09.05.2025.

What did the court decide?

The petition, along with the pending applications, is dismissed in default for non-prosecution, the petitioner having shown no interest in pursuing the petition. ¶¶14

Ramesh Thanwardass Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~15

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 10484/2016, CM APPLs 653/2017, 29883/2018, 29894/2018, 17212/2025 RAMESH THANWARDASS .....Petitioner Through: None.

¶4

versus

¶5

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Amitoj Chadha, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 09.05.2025

¶10

There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

¶11

A perusal of the record shows that on 06.12.2024, a request for adjournment was noted on behalf of the petitioner. The Predecessor Bench had noted that the petitioner did not seem to be interested in pursuing the matter however, in the interest of justice, one final opportunity was granted for the petitioner to appear in person. The matter was re-notified for 06.03.2025 on which date also there was no appearance and the petitioner failed to comply with the directions of the Court.

¶12

Thereafter, on 25.03.2025, on an application filed by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking discharge in the matter stating that the petitioner remained unresponsive, a notice of default was issued to the petitioner . However, as per the office noting, the petitioner could not be served.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:33:32

¶14

It is apparent that the petitioner has no interest in pursuing the present petition. Accordingly, the petition along with pending applications is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.

¶15

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶16

MAY 9, 2025/ rd

¶17

Ramesh Thanwardass v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Thanwardass v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Nikon Finlease Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -04, Delhi & Ors.

Sqn Ldr Swati Prakash Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Vinod Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Ajay Prakash Mishra Vs the Registrar Cooperative Societies through Assistant Registrar & Anr.

Maanoj Agarwala Vs Idbi Bank

Loconav India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assessment Unit Income Tax Department Delhi and Anr.

Sandeep Chopra Vs Commissioner of MCD & Ors.

Rajkumar Sukhdevsinhji & Anr. Vs Idbi Bank

Kuljeet Singh Chadha Vs the Management of Ibm India Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India Vs Sh. Subhash & Anr.

Birendra Kumar Mohapatra Vs Commissioner Employee Provident Fund & Anr.

Simon Anthony Vs Union of India and Anr.

Kashish Babbar and Anr. Vs State Bank of India and Ors.

M/S Khyber Service Station and Anr. Vs Kali Charan