Disposed

Uday Singh & Anr. v. the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC5 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/10420/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of this writ petition and application for exemption. Directions were issued to the respondent to take requisite action against unauthorized construction unless removed by owners within 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to exceptions. Petition disposed with directions to the MCD to take action against unauthorized construction after due procedure.

Uday Singh & Anr. Vs the Commissioner Municipal… — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 10420/2025 & CM APPL. 43285/2025

¶4

UDAY SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate versus

¶5

ISSIONER MU	NICIP	AL CO	RPORA	TION O .....Re	F DELHI spondents
Through:	Mr. for R	Vikra -1 & 2	maditya (M:981	Singh, 0045281	Advocate )
	Mr.	Akhil	Mittal,	ASC-D	DA with
	Mr.	Sidha	nt Gar	g, Ms.	Navita,
	Adv	ocates	for	R-3	and 4
	(M:9	212504	099)

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶7

O R D E R % 05.08.2025

¶8

CM APPL. 43285/2025 (For Exemption)

¶9

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶11

W.P.(C) 10420/2025

¶12

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent nos. 1 to 4 to take immediate and necessary action as per the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (“DMC Act”), against the ongoing illegal and unauthorized construction and encroachment at plot bearing Khasra Nos. 272 and 273, an area of approximately 400 square yards, Village Devli, New Delhi-110062 , in the shape of high rise building without obtaining Sanctioned Building Plan.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:37:12

¶15

Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2- Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), on advance notice, submits that the Show Cause Notice against the unauthorized construction in question has already been issued on 16^th July, 2025.

¶16

He further submits that they have received a reply from the owners/occupiers of the property in question, who have undertaken that they shall remove the unauthorized construction/encroachment themselves.

¶17

He submits that for this purpose, 30 days time period has been granted to the owners/occupiers of the said property.

¶18

He further submits that, in case, requisition action is not taken by the owners/occupiers of the property in question, the MCD, itself, shall take requisite action against the same.

¶19

He further submits that, as per his instructions, there is no high rise building and the construction is only up to basement and ground floor.

¶20

The aforesaid statement is taken note of and the MCD is bound by the said statement.

¶21

It is accordingly directed that, in case, the owners/occupiers of the property in question do not remove the unauthorized construction/encroachment by themselves, requisite action shall be taken by the MCD in accordance with law, after following the due procedure.

¶22

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition, along with pending application, is accordingly disposed of.

¶23

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶24

AUGUST 5, 2025/ au

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:37:12

Uday Singh & Anr. v. the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Singh & Anr. v. the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mrs Rajlakshmi Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. Vs Pankaj Shakya

M/S Nrs Catering Unit Vs Union of India & Ors.

Indira Menon Vs Delhi Police Licensing Department

Lt Col Samir Kumar Singh Vs Army Group Insurance Fund and Ors.

Manisha Sejwal Vs Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board & Anr.

Samast Jawala Heri Gaon Residents Welfare Association (Regd.) Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

M/S Nrs Catering Unit Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vinni Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Rakesh Chander Kapoor & Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Pheran Singh Yadav & Anr. Vs MCD

Rantej Singh Boparai Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Govinda Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.