“7. Further, as shown by the counsel for the respondents, the applicant had asked for child care leave for taking care of her children, whose date of births are 10.11.1997 and 7.7.2000 and were of the age of 19+ and 17+ during the period when she asked for the same. Quite simply, the applicant asked for CCL as per her convenience and, in fact, the applicant asked for CCL for very long periods at a time, i.e., 149 days, 114 days, 465 days and 434 days at a time. We note that the respondents tried to accommodate the request and did sanction her CCL for 78 days, 15 days and 27 days at different periods of time after taking into account the need of the students of their school as no alternative Maths teacher is available to them. Hence, it cannot be said by any stretch of imagination that respondents were unfair to the applicant or were harassing her. Further, the application for EOL was given by the applicant on her own accord and the same was sanctioned by the respondents. After seeking EOL, there is no ground for her to turn around and now seek a declaration that the respondents should have sanctioned the full CCL she asked for over long continuous spells of time despite knowing the fact that she was one of the only two Maths Teachers in the said School. Applicant had asked for the leave mostly in the months of August to December, which are very important periods for completing the syllabus. In one case, she asked for continuous leave for over a year. Further, as per the said OM dated 18.11.2018 itself, it is clear that CCL cannot be demanded as a matter of right, as the same is also to be seen in the context of also being subject to smooth functioning of the school and this does not mean that long spells CCL should be allowed
