Disposed
Aditya Sharma v. Arif
Delhi HCTR.P.(CRL.)/113/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought transfer of a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 NI Act. Court noted the drawer bank is located within the jurisdiction of the current court. Petition disposed of as no transfer was necessary.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- TR.P.(CRL.) 113/2023
¶4
ADITYA SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh & Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus ARIF ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶5
CORAM:
¶6
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
¶7
O R D E R % 01.03.2024
¶8
- This transfer petition has been filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of the complaint case bearing CC No.617683/2016 under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and is currently pending before the Court of Ms.Twinkle Chawla, MM (NI Act), South-East District, Saket Courts.
¶9
- Learned counsel for the applicant reiterates that the drawer bank is Dhan Lakshmi Bank, Greater Kailash Part-II, which falls under the SouthEast District.
¶10
- A bare perusal of Annexure-1 shows that the present complaint has been filed and is pending before the learned MM, NI Act, South-East District, Saket Courts. Therefore, no orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The same is disposed of.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the complaint case is maintainable at the current forum or requires transfer?
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Aditya Sharma
- respondent
Arif
Coram
AI extract
Jyoti Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court