Ashok Kumar v. Mithilesh Kumari
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought transfer of a suit pending before the ADJ, North-West to the Court pending on the ground that both suits relate to the same property. The Court allowed the transfer.
What did the court decide?
Transfer of CS 110/2016 (Ashok Kumar v. Mohd. Irshad) from the ADJ, North-West, Rohini, Delhi to this Court to be heard along with CS(OS) 605/2016 (Ashok Kumar v. Smt. Dayawati).
What the court decided
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- TR.P.(C.) 1/2019
ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Ms. Shweta Sinha, K. Prasad and Mr. Sidharth Singh, Advs.
versus
MITHILESH KUMARI ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (O R A L) % 12.01.2024
1. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondent despite this matter having been called out twice. There was no appearance on the last date of hearing either.
2. This petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) seeks transfer of CS 110/2016 ( Ashok Kumar v. Mohd. Irshad ), presently pending before the learned ADJ, North-West, Rohini, Delhi to be heard along with CS(OS) 605/2016 ( Ashok Kumar v. Smt. Dayawati ) pending before this Court.
3. Mr. Singh submits that the both the suits relate to the same property.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether two suits relating to the same property pending in different courts should be transferred to be heard together.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ASHOK KUMAR
- respondent
MITHILESH KUMARI
Coram
C. HARI SHANKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court