Petitioner sought transfer of a civil suit regarding property possession from a Civil Court to a Family Court. Court held the suit does not attract exclusive Family Court jurisdiction and dismissed the transfer petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
Through: Mr. Viney Sharma, Adv. versus HARDEV SINGH DHALIWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pushp Saini and Mr. Rachit Sehajpal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 04.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:22:13
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
NOVEMBER 4, 2024 aks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:22:13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a suit for possession and recovery of mesne profits between husband and wife attracts exclusive jurisdiction under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
Harvinder Kaur
Hardev Singh DhalIWal
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a civil case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
