Naresh Sharma v. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant, despite prior adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
Through: None.
versus
NARESH KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR O R D E R
%
15.03.2024
1. On 4 March 2024, learned counsel for the appellant sought time to take instructions from his client, as to the time within which his client would be willing to vacate the suit property and deposit the arrears.
2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant.
3. Today, the matter has been called out twice. Once again, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant at either call.
4. In these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
MARCH 15, 2024 ab
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2024 at 11:34:28
NARESH SHARMA
NARESH KUMAR AGGARWAL
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court