Appellant sought leave to withdraw this appeal, intending to challenge the impugned order instead via a CM (Main) petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn at appellant's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
BALJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.
versus
SMT. SANTOSH SHEKHAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 10.01.2024
1. Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellant, submits that the impugned order ought to have been challenged by way of a CM (Main) petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. He, accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal as he submits that he would be filing a CM (Main) petition challenging the impugned order.
2. Noting the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 10, 2024 dsn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:25:38
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baljeet Singh
Smt. Santosh Shekhar
Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
