Partly allowed

Sneh Biotech Private Limited v. Flebo.in Private Limited

Delhi HC10 Dec 2024RFA(COMM)/536/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal arose from an order rejecting a civil plaint due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The High Court held rejection was improper when no summons were issued. It modified the order to return the plaint to the appellant for filing in a competent court.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order was modified to direct the lower court to return the plaint to the appellant for filing before a court of competent jurisdiction.

Sneh Biotech Private Limited Vs Flebo.in… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~94

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of decision: 10.12.2024

¶4

- RFA(COMM) 536/2024

¶5

SNEH BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED .....APPELLANT Through: Mr.Rishi Sood and Mr.Gurjot Singh, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

FLEBO.IN PRIVATE LIMITED .....RESPONDENT Through:

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶10

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 72468/2024 (Exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 72469/2024

¶12

This application has been filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 21 days’ delay in re-filing the present Regular First Appeal.

¶13

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned.

¶14

The application is disposed of.

¶15

RFA(COMM) 536/2024

¶16

This appeal has been filed challenging the Order dated 13.08.2024, passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court), South-West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in CS (COMM)/390/2024, titled Sneh Biotech Private Limited v. Flebo.In Private Limited., by

¶17

Signature Not Verified

¶18

Digitally Signed RFA(COMM) 536/2024 By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 3.12.2024 21:21:15

¶19

Page 1 of 3

¶20

which the plaint of the appellant herein has been ‘rejected’, while at the same time, granting liberty to the appellant to file the suit afresh in the Court of competent jurisdiction.

¶21

The above suit had been filed by the appellant praying for a decree of an amount of Rs.16,61,552/-, along with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 18% per annum till realization, against the defendant.

¶22

The territorial jurisdiction of the learned Trial Court was pleaded as under:

¶23

“That the Plaintiff Company has its registered office situated in Janakpuri. Moreover, the invoices were being sent by the Plaintiff to the Defendant from its registered office. Hence this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to try and decide this suit.”

¶24

The learned Trial Court, by its Impugned Order, has held that it lacks the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

¶25

The learned counsel for the appellant confines his challenge against the Impugned Order, by submitting that once the learned Trial Court had held that it lacks the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit, it should have returned the plaint in terms of under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, ‘CPC’), 1908, rather than rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.

¶26

As even summons in the suit had not yet been issued to the defendant, we do not deem it necessary to issue notice of this appeal to the respondent.

¶27

We find merit in the limited submission/challenge of the

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

Digitally Signed RFA(COMM) 536/2024 By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 3.12.2024 21:21:15

¶30

Page 2 of 3

¶31

appellant against the Impugned Judgment and decree dated 13.08.2024. Once the learned Trial Court had held that it lacks the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit, the proper course for the learned Trial Court was to return the plaint to the plaintiff, that is, the appellant herein, instead of rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.

¶32

We, accordingly, partially allow the present appeal and modify the Impugned Order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the learned Trial Court, by directing that the plaint in CS (COMM)/390/2024 shall be returned to the appellant for it to be filed by the appellant before the Court of competent jurisdiction.

¶33

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

¶34

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶35

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶36

DECEMBER 10, 2024/sg/DG

¶37

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶38

Signature Not Verified

¶39

Digitally Signed RFA(COMM) 536/2024 By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 3.12.2024 21:21:15

¶40

Page 3 of 3

Sneh Biotech Private Limited v. Flebo.in Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sneh Biotech Private Limited v. Flebo.in Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Kumari Vs Sanjay Saxena

Yadav Exhibitors (P) Limited Vs Karur Vysya Bank Limited

Kuljit Singh Vs Pawan Goyal and Anr.

Bharti Bhalla Vs Ravi Wadhwa

M/S Gir Movers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Pawan Singhal

Pankaj Jain Vs Sudhir Jain

Ashish Chaudhary Vs MD Ashfaq

M/S Real Dream Vacations & Ors. Vs M/S Signature Linkers Private Limited

Yadav Exhibitors (P) Limited Vs Karur Vysya Bank Limited

Union of India and Ors. Vs Ex Sgt Anil Sharma (Retd)

Anil Kumar Vs Union of India

Ex Rect Bhuw Aneshw Ar Sah Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ex Swr Rohtash Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Anuraag Jasraaj Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.