The present appeal was dismissed as not pressed. The appellant, M/S. KANODIA TECHNOPLAST LTD., sought leave to withdraw the appeal, which was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal due to lack of press.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
versus
ANIL KUMAR TYAGI .....RESPONDENT
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 02.12.2024
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
DECEMBER 2, 2024 sr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/12/2024 at 12:05:37
M/S. KANODIA TECHNOPLAST LTD.
ANIL KUMAR TYAGI
REKHA PALLI
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
