Appellant sought to withdraw its commercial appeal; the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.S.Sehgal, Advocate. versus JAGDISH PAPERS CORPORATION ..... RESPONDENT Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 15.02.2024 1. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal. 2. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application also stands disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
FEBRUARY 15, 2024 M
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:25:51
Hind Paper House
Jagdish Papers Corporation
Vibhu Bakhru
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
