Dismissed
Sudhir Kumar v. Bimla Devi
Delhi HCRFA/94/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to appear on the second call to pursue the matter.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 94/2023 & CM APPL. 5581/2023 & CM APPL. 5583/2023
¶4
SUDHIR KUMAR ..... Appellant
¶5
Through: None
¶6
versus
¶7
BIMLA DEVI ..... Respondent
¶8
Through: None
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
¶11
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant either to take passover or an adjournment on the second call.
¶12
It seems that the appellant does not wish to pursue this matter further. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sudhir Kumar
- respondent
Bimla Devi
Coram
AI extract
Chandra Dhar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court