Rudransh v. R.M.S Liberhan and Anr.

$~59

• IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 848/2024, CM APPL. 71010/2024, 71013/2024, 71012/2024 & 71011/2024 RUDRANSH .....Appellant Through: Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Advocate versus R.M.S LIBERHAN AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav M. Kiberhan and Ms. Akriti Gupta, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 05.12.2024

• [ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

1. The appellant has assailed preliminary decree of outstanding rent, which was passed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The original rent was Rs. 90,000/- per month admittedly by way of written lease deed. According to the case set up by the appellant, on account of covid pandemic the parties had orally reduced the rate of rent to Rs. 50,000/-, which stand was denied by the respondent.

1. After addressing partly, learned counsel for appellant on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file review application before the learned Trial Court on the issue of observation in para 8 of the impugned judgment that Rs. 50,000/- per month is outstanding.