Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear when the matter was called, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
KALPANA SHUKLA & ANR. .....Appellants
Through: None.
versus
ANITA RANI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Qamar Ali and Ms.Priyanka, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
None has appeared on behalf of the appellants either to take passover or an adjournment when the matter was called even on the second call.
It seems that the appellants are not interested to pursue the matter any further.
In view thereof, the appeal along with accompanying applications is thus dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MARCH 11, 2024 SV/RYP
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:46:00
Kalpana Shukla & Anr.
Anita Rani
Chandra Dhar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
