Dismissed
Sangeeta v. Sridevi
Delhi HCRFA/656/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appellant's appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared in the second round of listing nor had any previous attempt.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 656/2018 SANGEETA .....Appellant
¶4
Through: None. versus SRIDEVI .....Respondent Through: None.
¶5
CORAM:
¶6
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
¶7
O R D E R
¶8
- % 09.09.2024
¶9
- None has appeared for the parties despite the matter is called out in second round.
¶10
- None had appeared on 03.09.2024 as well.
¶11
- The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶12
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sangeeta
- respondent
Sridevi
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court